Scan — informe de muestra
Un informe de escaneo real — anonimizado
Mira cómo es un informe real antes de comprar uno: un informe real y anonimizado de un set de documentos real, no una simulación.
Sobre este set de documentos
Esta muestra está escrita con la voz del contratista (una "Bid Scope Review"), la voz que usará Grudar para Contratistas Generales. Los informes para arquitectos traen los mismos hallazgos, escritos como las preguntas que harán los licitantes antes de emitir.
Narrativa
Un resumen en lenguaje sencillo de lo que encontró el escaneo, para que sepas por dónde empezar a leer. (En inglés, como se entrega en un informe real.)
Alcance en este set de documentos
Lo que los documentos comprometen al contratista a hacer. (Hallazgos en inglés, como se entregan en un informe real.)
Se muestran 11 elementos representativos de los 41 hallazgos de alcance reales de este escaneo. Un informe real los enumera todos — esta página de muestra se acorta por legibilidad; nada en tu informe real se recorta jamás.
Overall scope: interior renovation
Building construction scope is a repair-and-renovation of an existing, approximately 6,227 sq ft building, covering all interior rooms and finishes plus mechanical, electrical, and plumbing installations.
Advertisement for Bids
Building vacated for construction
The building will be empty during construction; the owner removes all furniture before work begins.
Addendum #1
Utilities and testing by owner
Utilities are provided by the owner. Testing during construction is also by the owner; the general contractor is responsible only for coordinating testing.
Addendum #1
No new doors in scope
No new doors are included in the scope, despite some conflicting language in the hardware schedule; all existing doors and hardware are to remain.
Addendum #1 / Addendum #2
Ceiling painting scope
All ceilings, including those in the offices and the closet, are to be painted.
Addendum #1 / Addendum #2
Exterior repaint scope
Exterior painting scope covers anything existing that is already painted — all previously painted surfaces are to be repainted, including the overhead doors (color selected by the owner).
Addendum #2 / Construction Drawings
Masonry patch scope
Brick veneer repair is to be performed by cutting out and replacing brick with like-kind brick and mortar.
Addendum #2
No landscaping / no photo documentation required
No landscaping is included in the scope of work, and professional photo documentation is not required on this project.
Addendum #2
Existing casework and fixtures reused
Existing kitchen casework and plumbing fixtures are to be removed and reinstalled, not replaced.
Addendum #2 / Construction Drawings
ADA upgrade scope
ADA improvements include an accessible van parking space, two accessible entrance sidewalks, and increased accessibility at one designated toilet room.
Construction Drawings
Moisture remediation required
Moisture remediation is required on all existing and new concrete slabs before any new flooring is installed.
Updated Structural / Civil Drawings
Conflictos por resolver antes de cotizar
Dónde los documentos no coinciden — si cotizas uno de ellos, cotizaste el equivocado. (Hallazgos en inglés, como se entregan en un informe real.)
Se muestran los 6 conflictos que encontró este escaneo — todos.
Specification inconsistency
Addendum #2's answer to RFI #8 calls for a 6" slab-on-grade with #3 rebar at 16" O.C. for the vehicle-bay slab, but the revised structural detail in the same addendum package shows an 8", 4,000 PSI slab over 6" washed stone with a #4 rebar mat at 12" O.C. each way. The two answers contradict each other.
Suggested question: RFI #8 in Addendum 2 says the vehicle-bay slab is 6" with #3 bar at 16" O.C., but the revised slab detail shows 8" with a #4 mat at 12" O.C. each way. Which one do we bid?
Addendum #2, RFI #8 vs. the revised slab detail
Missing information
Addendum #2's answer to RFI #18 directs bidders to the Finish Specifications for the acoustical ceiling tile basis of design, but the referenced sheet is listed as the Roof Plan in the drawing index and shows no finish specs. The referenced basis of design can't be located.
Suggested question: RFI #18 sends us to Finish Specs for the ACT, but that sheet is the Roof Plan and has no finish specs or ACT basis of design. Where is the ACT basis of design actually located?
Addendum #2, RFI #18 vs. the referenced Finish Specifications sheet
Specification inconsistency
Addendum #2 revises the electrical legend so smoke/carbon detectors suffice everywhere except the kitchen, which needs a heat detector — but it's unclear whether the kitchen gets a standalone heat detector plus a smoke/carbon unit, or a single combination device.
Suggested question: The kitchen needs a heat detector per the addendum. Do you want a standalone heat detector in addition to a smoke/carbon unit, or a single combo device?
Electrical legend vs. Addendum #2
Specification inconsistency
The finish plan's floor-type hatch symbols reference six floor types, but there's no room-by-room assignment confirming which rooms get carpet tile, LVT, sealed concrete, or porcelain tile. The LVT basis of design is internally consistent, but room assignments are unclear.
Suggested question: The finish plan hatches reference floor types 1-6. Can you confirm which rooms get carpet tile, LVT, sealed concrete, and porcelain tile?
Finish Specifications & flooring spec section vs. the finish-plan hatch legend
Specification inconsistency
The finish schedule calls for a same-day curing compound as the sealed finish for one floor type, while the Finish Specs call out a specific floor-sealer product and the concrete spec section separately lists an ASTM C309 curing compound. It's unclear whether the curing compound is the final finish or whether a separate sealer follows.
Suggested question: For sealed concrete floors, is the same-day curing compound also the final sealed finish, or do we apply a separate sealer after curing?
Finish schedule vs. Finish Specs & the concrete spec section
Ambiguous requirement
A structural note states the new slab-on-grade is set approximately 2" below the finished floor of adjacent wings, creating a floor-elevation transition at doorways. The detail for handling that transition isn't specified.
Suggested question: The new slab is noted approximately 2" below the finished floor of adjacent wings. How do you want the transition handled at doorways — ramp, threshold, or built-up floor?
Structural slab-on-grade note
Preguntas para enviar
Envía estas antes de la fecha de licitación; cada una es un número que de otro modo tendrías que adivinar. (Hallazgos en inglés, como se entregan en un informe real.)
Se muestran las 12 preguntas que produjo este escaneo — 11 redactadas a partir de los documentos, más 1 de la pasada de verificación en sitio.
Project funding source and wage rates
What is the funding source for this project? If the owner is using federal or state grant dollars, Davis-Bacon / prevailing-wage rates and federal procurement rules can apply — confirm before setting labor rates; it moves the number materially.
Vehicle-bay slab rebar conflict
RFI #8 in Addendum 2 says the vehicle-bay slab is 6" with #3 bar at 16" O.C., but the revised detail shows an 8" slab with a #4 mat at 12" O.C. each way. Which one do we bid?
ACT basis of design location
RFI #18 sends us to the Finish Specs for the acoustical ceiling tile, but that sheet has no finish specs or ACT basis of design. Where is it actually located?
Kitchen detector configuration
The kitchen needs a heat detector per the addendum. Do you want a standalone heat detector in addition to a smoke/carbon unit, or a single combo device?
Room-by-room flooring assignment
The finish-plan hatches reference six floor types. Can you confirm which rooms get carpet tile, LVT, sealed concrete, and porcelain tile?
Sealed-concrete finish sequence
For sealed concrete floors, is the same-day curing compound also the final sealed finish, or do we apply a separate sealer after curing?
Slab transition at doorways
The new slab is noted about 2" below the finished floor of adjacent wings. How do you want the transition handled at doorways — ramp, threshold, or built-up floor?
Civil drawings — preliminary or for construction?
The civil sheets are stamped "preliminary — not for recordation, sales, or conveyance" and carry a different project number than the building set. Can you confirm these are the final for-construction documents, and clarify whether the ADA parking, accessible sidewalks, and any drainage work shown are all in the general contractor's bid scope?
Allowances, unit prices, or alternates
The bid form references a scheduled-allowances section that isn't in the table of contents or project manual, and no alternates or unit prices are listed anywhere. Can you confirm there are no allowances, unit prices, or alternates to carry in the base bid?
Required concrete strength for standard slabs
The concrete spec lists two classes both calling for "minimum compressive strength as indicated," but the drawings only give a strength for the vehicle-bay slab and the trench pour-back. Can you provide the required 28-day compressive strength for the standard slabs-on-grade and any footings, so all bidders price the same mix?
Shower accessories at a demoed fixture
One sheet shows an existing shower being demoed, but the addendum says new toilet accessories are only required at one specific toilet room, with all others existing to remain. Since the accessories spec includes shower curtain rods and curtains, can you clarify whether new shower accessories are required at the demoed shower, or if that fixture is being removed entirely?
Existing conditions — field verification needed before pricing
No reliable square footage could be derived from the drawings or records. Confirm on site: interior usable area and gross footprint; floor-to-floor heights; key room dimensions; the electrical service size/amperage at the main panel; and the HVAC tonnage/capacity and distribution.
Site recon — field-verify list
Riesgos y señales
Condiciones que afectarán el costo o el cronograma si no se atienden.
"No structured risk items were produced for this set — see the narrative overview." (Así se muestra en el informe real, en inglés.)
Se muestra aquí exactamente como se vería para un cliente real: este set de documentos en particular no produjo ningún hallazgo de tipo riesgo, y el informe lo indica con claridad en lugar de dejar la sección en blanco sin explicación. Una sección vacía nunca es silenciosa.
Cobertura
Un recuento claro de lo que este escaneo realmente leyó, para que sepas exactamente qué quedó cubierto y qué no. Esta sección aparece en todo informe — incluso en uno limpio — porque "no se omitió nada" es una afirmación que solo Cobertura puede hacer.
- No se subieron fotos, así que no hay lectura de materiales/condiciones en sitio para este proyecto.
Este fue un escaneo de solo documentos — las 33 imágenes encontradas dentro de los PDF eran figuras incrustadas en los documentos (logotipos de rótulo, referencias de detalle), no fotos reales del sitio, así que no cuentan en el total de fotos y la sección de Condiciones Existentes no aparece en este informe en particular. Un escaneo de solo documentos igual recibe todas las demás secciones completas.
Mira cuánto cuesta
Este informe vino de un set de licitación estándar de un solo edificio.